There are lots of ways to
do the same thing in Photoshop. This allows "experts" to produce
a seemingly unending supply of tips. So many, in fact, that one
gets confused as to what to use.
Here is a step chart with
equal steps on the top and the same chart with a duplicate layer
set to screen mode and 100% opacity below it. This technique is frequently
offered as a way to fix under exposed images.
The number over the steps
show the RGB values for the original and the screened version.
Notice that there is a considerable lightening of the dark values
and a slightly lesser amount for the lighter ones.
the overlay has done is to alter the tonality gradient. So we
should be able to achieve the same effect using a simple
I created an adjustment curve layer and while it was opened I control-clicked on a series of steps in the original step chart to create control points. For each control point I edited the output value so that it matched the one in the screened curve.
Since this is a fairly smooth curve, it was not necessary to put a control point for each step. As a matter of fact Photoshop limits the number of control points so this would not be possible in any case.
This is what the curve dialog looked like after making all the adjustments.
is the image after the curve adjustment layer has been applied to
the upper step chart. Notice that the two step charts are now the
Is there any advantage to using one technique over the other? Well using an overlay layer can be faster. In addition you can easily try different blend modes and opacity percentages.
Using curves, however, allows you to make more precise changes. For example instead of having step three go from a value of 25 to 48 I could make it 47 or 49. This would not be possible with an overlay.
Another reason to use curves is that you can see what is happening to the image gradient explicitly. This will improve your understanding of tonal editing and enable you to make the right choices for other images. You can figure out what is happening by making your own step chart and measuring the changes.
types of tonal adjustments also apply to color changes. The new
Photo Filter color balance tool falls into this class. It is just
necessary to adjust each of the color curves individually.
Many of the third-party filters also fall into this class. What you gain is ease of use, not a unique result.
A big exception to this is the class of adjustments that use the surrounding pixels to make tonal adjustments.
One of the most highly publicized is the new Highlight/Shadow tool.
Notice in this dialog box that there is a radius parameter for both the shadows and the highlights. This means that a normal tone control won't work.
Shadow Highlight Dialog
is the result of using the above values on the lower step
The thing to note here is that in addition to changes in the tonality gradation there are changes to tonal level at the edges of each step.
The only way to achieve this type of effect with standard curve tools would be to define a series of unsharp masks for different brightness levels and then apply curves to each masked area. This is obviously much more labor intensive.
So it is possible to produce most of your edits using just the standard tools. This may make the "experts" less necessary, but should help the average user maintain his sanity!
© 2004 Robert D Feinman